Asian Journal of Criminal Justice and Forensic Studies

  • Received 30.06.2025,
  • Revised 06.11.2025,
  • Accepted 16.12.2025
Download article Download article
Vol. 1, No. 1. 2025
  • radicalisation; extremism; threats; profiling; counter-terrorism
  • Pages 24-34

This study aimed to develop adapted forensic-psychological approaches for terrorism risk assessment in Central and South Asia, considering the region’s specificities and threat dynamics. The methodology was based on a theoretical analysis of secondary data, including global terrorism reports and official legislative documents from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Pakistan. The primary methods were trend observation, activity product analysis, and comparative legal method. The results indicated that the region’s terrorist landscape is transforming from hierarchical structures to decentralised networks and individual actors, posing significant challenges. It was established that South Asia, particularly Pakistan, continues to demonstrate a high level of terrorist activity, whereas Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan face growing, albeit still low, risks. It was recorded that in 2024, Pakistan experienced a more than twofold increase in the number of terrorist attacks, from 517 to 1,099 incidents, and the number of fatalities increased by 45%, from 748 to 1,081. Significant gaps were also identified in understanding the psychological criminogenic factors of radicalisation and recidivism, and existing Western risk assessment models require adaptation to the local socio-cultural context. In this regard, adapted forensic-psychological approaches were developed, accounting for cultural sensitivity, religious specificity, behavioural indicators, psychosocial factors, language barriers, legislative context, and the integration of artificial intelligence for accurate risk assessment in Central and South Asia. The practical value of the study lies in the potential for its results to be used by law enforcement agencies, security services, and judicial institutions to enhance terrorism risk assessment methodologies. The developed approaches can serve as a basis for creating training programmes for psychologist practitioners working in the field of counter-terrorism, as well as for developing national strategies for countering radicalisation and reintegration programmes for former combatants

References

  1. Abbas, S.A., & Syed, S.H. (2021). Sectarian terrorism in Pakistan: Causes, impact and remedies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(2), 350-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.06.004.  
  2. Amman, M., & Meloy, J.R. (2021). Stochastic terrorism: A linguistic and psychological analysis. Perspectives on Terrorism, 15(5), 2-13.
  3. Ashkenazi, T., & Fisher, R.P. (2022). Field test of the cognitive interview to enhance eyewitness and victim memory, in intelligence investigations of terrorist attacks. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(2), 200-208. doi: 10.1037/h0101871.
  4. Astana jubilee declaration towards a security community. (2010). Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/d/8/74990.pdf.
  5. Bilal, F.E., Abbas, R., & Rashid, M.A. (2022). Terrorism in Pakistan: A critical analysis. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(2), 1003-1013. doi: 10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)85.  
  6. Binder, J.F., & Kenyon, J. (2022). Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article number 997390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997390.
  7. Borum, R. (2004). Psychology of terrorism. Tampa: University of South Florida.
  8. Chan, E. (2023). Technology-facilitated gender-based violence, hate speech, and terrorism: A risk assessment on the rise of the incel rebellion in Canada. Violence Against Women, 29(9), 1687-1718. doi: 10.1177/10778012221125495.
  9. Chutia, T. (2021). Uzbekistan: A critical analysis of the official discourse on terrorism. Conflict Studies Quarterly, 37. doi: 10.24193/csq.37.2.
  10. Clesle, A., Knäble, J., & Rettenberger, M. (2024). Risk and threat assessment instruments for violent extremism: A systematic review. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 12(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1037/tam0000223.
  11. Country Reports on Terrorism. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2023/.
  12. Diamant, I. (2021). Advantages and challenges using psychological tests in the assessment of suicide bombers and lone actors. In Terrorism risk assessment instruments (pp. 280-296). Amsterdam: IOS Press. doi: 10.3233/NHSDP210017
  13. European Union terrorism situation and trend report. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/EU_TE-SAT_2025.pdf.
  14. Fisher, D., & Kearns, E.M. (2024). The theorizing of terrorism within criminology. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 61(4), 487-520. doi: 10.1177/00224278231156754.
  15. Gerges, F.A. (2021). ISIS: A history (NED-New ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctv18b5d6w.
  16. Global Terrorism Index. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.
  17. Höffler, K., Meyer, M., & Möller, V. (2022). Risk assessment – the key to more security? Factors, tools, and practices in dealing with extremist individuals. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28, 269-295. doi: 10.1007/s10610-021-09502-6.
  18. Jitariuc, V. (2023). The crime of terrorism: Forensic characteristics and methods of committing it. Cogito-Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 15(4), 173-185.
  19. Kazakhstan and UNODC reinforce cooperation in countering cross-border crime. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/roca/en/NEWS/2025/kazakhstan-and-unodc-reinforce-cooperation-in-countering-cross-border-crime.html.
  20. Kazakhstan Security Radar. (2025). Retrieved from https://peace.fes.de/security-radar-2025/country-profiles/kazakhstan.html.
  21. Kenyon, J., Carter, A.J., Watson, S., & Farr, J. (2025). Adapting risk assessments to a changing terrorism landscape: Revising the extremism risk guidance. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 70(5), 2031-2041. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.70101.  
  22. LaFree, G., & Schwarzenbach, A. (2021). Micro and macro-level risk factors for extremism and terrorism: Toward a criminology of extremist violence. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), 184-202. doi: 10.1515/mks-2021-0127.
  23. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 178-IV “On Amendments and Supplements to Certain Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Information and Communication Networks”. (2009, July). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z090000178_.
  24. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 191-IV “On Combating the Legalization (Laundering) of Criminally Obtained Incomes and the Financing of Terrorism”. (2009, August). Retrieved from https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30466908.
  25. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 266-IV “On Amendments and Supplements to Certain Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Counter-Terrorism Issues”. (2010, April). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z100000266_.
  26. Logan, C., & Sellers, R. (2021). Risk assessment and management in violent extremism: A primer for mental health practitioners. In Violent extremism (pp. 1-23). London: Routledge.
  27. Logan, C., Borum, R., & Gill, P. (Eds.). (2023). Violent extremism: A handbook of risk assessment and management. London: UCL Press.
  28. Model Legislative Provisions. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/terrorism/Website2021/220204_model_legislative_provisions.pdf.
  29. Pfaff, C.A. (Ed.). (2025). The weaponization of AI: The next stage of terrorism and warfare. Ankara: Centre of Excellence Defence Against Terrorism.
  30. Regional Expert Group Meeting Addresses Terrorism and Foreign Terrorist Fighters in Central Asia. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/terrorism/latest-news/2025-regional-expert-group-meeting-addresses-terrorism-and-foreign-terrorist-fighters-in-central-asia.html?testme.
  31. Resolution of the Security Council Committee of the United Nations No. 1267. (1999, October). Retrieved from https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/ru/s/res/1267-(1999).
  32. Resolution of the Security Council Committee of the United Nations No. 1540. (2004, April). Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/520326?v=pdf.
  33. Ripperger, B. (2021). The use of terrorism risk assessment tools in Australia to manage residual risk. In C. Logan & P. Gill (Eds.), Terrorism risk assessment instruments (pp. 165-192). Amsterdam: IOS Press. doi: 10.3233/NHSDP210010.
  34. Sarma, K.M., Carthy, S.L., & Cox, K.M. (2022). Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(3), article number e1268. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1268.
  35. Shukuralieva, N., & Lipiński, A. (2021). Islamic extremism and terrorism in Central Asia: A critical analysis. Central Asia & the Caucasus, 22(1), 106-117.
  36. Silke, A. (2025). Factors in terrorist risk assessment: A rapid evidence assessment of the extremism risk guidance (ERG22+) factors. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 15(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1108/JCP-04-2024-0035.
  37. Sukabdi, Z.A. (2021). Psychological risk factors of terrorist offenders in Indonesia. Journal of Psychological Research, 03(03), article number 3299. doi: 10.30564/JPR.V3I3.3299.
  38. The fight against terrorism and extremism in Kazakhstan. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/mfa/press/article/details/589?lang=ru.
  39. The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism. (2025). Retrieved from https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-global-initiative-to-combat-nuclear-terrorism/.
  40. Thijssen, G., Masthoff, E., Sijtsema, J., & Bogaerts, S. (2023). Understanding violent extremism: Socio-demographic, criminal and psychopathological background characteristics of detainees residing in Dutch terrorism wings. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 23(2), 290-308. doi: 10.1177/17488958211049019.  
  41. Trimbur, M., Amad, A., Horn, M., Thomas, P., & Fovet, T. (2021). Are radicalization and terrorism associated with psychiatric disorders? A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 141, 214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.002.  
  42. UNRCCA (Central Asia). (2025, February). Retrieved from https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/monthly-forecast/2025-02/unrcca-central-asia-13.php.
  43. Victims of terrorism. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/terrorism/expertise/victims-of-terrorism.html.
  44. Zhussupova, G.B. (2025). Effectiveness of the legal policy of the republic of Kazakhstan in countering terrorism and religious extremism. Nauka, 2(85), 52-55.

Submission